BluegrassBulletin.com

8 Year Old "Bride" Raped To Death By 40 Year Old "Husband"

This is what you get when you follow the teachings of a pedophile prophet:

An 8-year-old Yemeni girl has become the latest victim of the Religion of Pieces.  Harwan, the little girl, lived in the tribal area of Hardh in northwestern Yemen, near the Saudi border.  Her family married Harwan to a bridegroom approximately five times as old as she was.  He insisted on his marital rights on their wedding night.  These marital rights included tearing Harwan’s genitals so that she bled to death.[Gateway Pundit]

An 8-year-old Yemeni girl has become the latest victim of the Religion of Pieces.  Harwan, the little girl, lived in the tribal area of Hardh in northwestern Yemen, near the Saudi border.  Her family married Harwan to a bridegroom approximately five times as old as she was.  He insisted on his marital rights on their wedding night.  These marital rights included tearing Harwan’s genitals so that she bled to death. - See more at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/09/8-year-old-yemeni-child-bride-raped-to-death-on-wedding-night-by-40-year-old-bridegroom/#sthash.Esz0v914.dpuf

Religion Of Peace Update: Woman Murdered Over Women's Rights

From Turley:

In a culture of the oppression and abuse of women, Sushmita Banerjee stood out. An Indian married to an Afghan businessman, Banerjee wrote of the rule of the Taliban and her effort to flee the medieval Islamic rules placed on women. Her book “A Kabuliwala’s Bengali Wife” was an inspiration for women facing religious oppression and was later made into the movie “Escape From The Taliban.” The title proved tragically optimistic. This week, after she returned to her husband in Afghanistan, Banerjee was executed at her home by the Taliban.

Oh, but we dare not speak ill of Islam, so says our commander in chief.  But if we make even the slightest comment about a female candidate being an "empty dress" we've crossed some imaginary red line of misogynistic politics.

Idiocracy has arrived.

Krauthammer: Obama's Incompetent Syria Fiasco

Once again Charles Krauthammer hits the nail on the head. He says that Obama's actions make it very clear that he wants no part of Syria.  Krauthammer cites Obama's lack of effort to do anything about Assad until the red line comment forced him to.  Then, Sir Charles says, Obama isn't sure what to do next.

Sen. Bob Corker: “What is it you’re seeking?”

Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:“I can’t answer that, what we’re seeking.”

– Senate hearing on the use of force in Syria, Sept. 3.

We have a problem. The president proposes attacking Syria, and his top military officer cannot tell you the objective. Does the commander in chief know his own objective? Why, yes. “A shot across the bow,” explained Barack Obama.

Now, a shot across the bow is a warning. Its purpose is to say: Cease and desist, or the next shot will sink you. But Obama has already told the world – and Bashar al-Assad in particular – that there will be no next shot. He has insisted time and again that the operation will be finite and highly limited. Take the shot, kill some fish, go home.

What then is the purpose?

Dempsey hasn’t a clue, but Secretary of State John Kerry says it will uphold and proclaim a norm and thus deter future use of chemical weapons. With a few Tomahawk missiles? Hitting sites that, thanks to the administration having leaked the target list, have already been scrubbed of important military assets? [Krauthammer Opinion Enquirer]

While I have personally been advocating for more than a year that we take some action to assist the innocent people in Syria being slaughtered by their own government, I now tend to agree that the greatest danger of taking action is that the commander who would be in charge is totally incompetent.  It would be like trusting a gun to a toddler.

Taking no action has the potential for bad consequences, not the least of which is the real possibility that we will be tested again.  But giving the keys to the war machine to Obama is far more reckless.

Egyptian Paper Says Obama Member Of Muslim Brotherhood

You decide for yourself:

Aljazeera.com Reported:

The Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center, Shadi Hamid, tweets out about the Egyptian media depicting Obama as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Newspaper also claims that son of Muslim Brotherhood leader threatened Obama with release of “papers” revealing his MB membership.

h/t Gateway Pundit

Aljazeera.com Reported:

The Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center, Shadi Hamid, tweets out about the Egyptian media depicting Obama as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Newspaper also claims that son of Muslim Brotherhood leader threatened Obama with release of “papers” revealing his MB membership.

- See more at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/#sthash.smnvr8u9.dpuf

Well Isn't That Special: British Companies Sold Chem Weapon Components To Syria

The video below is a bit over generalized, but the information is essentially correct.  The British government did authorize various companies to sell chemical components of Sarin gas directly to Assad.  What components?  One was Sodium Flouride, you know, the stuff in your tap water.

Of course potassium flouride is not in toothpaste as far as I can tell and Britain did not authorize the sale of Sarin gas. In fact, Sarin gas is so unstable that it has a shelf life of only a few days. So the idea that flouride is a chemical weapon is silly, and so is the notion that tap water is a chemical weapon silly, but......that the British did in fact know that these chemicals were used in the production of chemical weapons and allowed the sale of the components to Syria AFTER the uprising, does at least offer one explanation why the British Parliament wouldn't give the Prime Minister permission to participate in bombing.

Syria: What's It Really All About?

EDITORIAL

Cynics will tell you that Obama's only reason for going into Syria would be to make himself look good after having made the "red line" speech.  Haters will tell you that Obama wants to do everything possible to collapse the US economy and another war is a quick way to do that.  But what is the Syria issue really about?

First, when you hear the word Syria, think Iran.  Assad is the bait Iran has laid in the Middle East to entice us into armed conflict.  The goal is a war in which Iran can excuse its planned attack on Israel and other interests in the region of importance to the United States.

Second, much of the Middle East is aligned with our interests.  Despite the homegrown terrorism of Osama Bin Laden, we are still very entangled with Saudi Arabia.  We have friends in Turkey and Jordan.  Iran is the bully thug of the region and the more stable governments would like nothing more than to see the Iranian's brought to heel.  While our friends don't want war to disrupt their comfy lives, they would welcome somebody putting a boot on Iran's throat and Syria is as close as it gets.

Third, with Iraq and Afghanistan winding down buhzillionaires who you never hear about are facing loss of revenue from sales of everything from food, fuel, and clothing to weapons, machinery and vehicles.  They have a very well funded lobby in Washington that is charged with the duty to see that government contracts for their goods continue to get signed.  In otherwords, forces behind the scenes at home are pushing war.

Fourth, Obama has a political game to play. And a show of military strength has always helped give presidents more political capital.  By putting the GOP right smack dab in the middle of the debate whether to take action or not, Obama can score points, divide his opponents and create political chaos.

Fifth, what's at stake is the world's view of America's tolerance of dangerous activities like using chemical weapons, amassing nuclear weapons, threatening global terrorism and Islamic Jihad.  Iran is creating a recruiting and training station for these activities and has virtually declared war on the rest of the world.  Many countries are worried what might come to them out of Iran.  The United States is viewed as the least tolerant of terrorism having 9-11 as a reason to have declared war on it.  The world is looking to see if the USA blinks on this one.

And next, there is of course the issue of human rights for which the USA still stands as a beacon of hope.  Do we have credibility, or do we engage in selective enforcement of human rights only when it serves our needs.  No, we are not the world's policemen, but we are the world's savior as our fathers proved near the middle of the last century.

What's the Syria issue really all about?  These things and any other sales pitch for one viewpoint or the other which will be trotted out as America debates what we stand for, what we stand against and who stands with who.

Why Has Globalist Obama Avoided A UN Resolution In Syria?

Barack Obama called himself a "citizen of the world" in his 2008 Berlin speech.  His approach to foreign policy since has suggested that he is more interested in making the world "one" than in quarterbacking a victory for America.  But now, however, when Syria is accused of using chemical weapons against its own citizens Obama seems prepared to "go it alone" and launch missiles into the country.  Why is he avoiding a UN solution?

The question can probably only be answered by conspiracy theorists and deep White House insiders.  Odds are that forces far more powerful than Obama could ever hope to become control the millions and billions of dollars that military actions generate.  And because they control the money, they control the president.

If stinger missiles cost the US government about half a million dollars each, what do you think those things will fetch on the black market?  And if you own a company that makes and sells military equipment to the government and it never gets used, how are you going to sell more unless they use some of what they've got?

And how about the companies that provide food, and fuel and medical supplies and contract for computer technology or get rent from the use of their satellites, or that need the fire power of a government to make an offer to a foreign leader that he "can't refuse"?

The world is not what it appears to be and what is going on behind the scenes is more than we will likely know in our lifetimes.  But, for a president who claims to be so "transparent" and such a globalist, one would think he would make his case either to the American people, via our Congress, or to the UN.

Doing neither raises suspicions about his motives and justification.

Unintended Consequences Out Of Syria?

Having delayed our efforts to help the victims of the Assad regime fight off his oppression earlier we are now in a position where the POTUS is about to engage in unilaterally staged armed aggression against the Assad regime, an effort which might be helpful to Al Qaeda.  But that's not the worst of it.

Obama came to power under the mantra of "Bush lied, people died."  That mindset had its roots in the belief that there were no "Weapons of Mass Destruction" found in Iraq and that therefore the invasion and the loss of American lives was a fraud.

But do you remember the news reports of convoys of trucks leaving Iraq just before the invasion heading to Syria?  And do you remember the reports that Saddam Hussein had secreted his WMD's out of Iraq in advance of our coming?  And do you remember his refusal to allow inspections?

Well here's one for you.  What if Obama does in fact "go in" to Syria and finds that the chemical weapons which John Kerry confirms were used, were the WMD's from Iraq?

Who'd be the fraud now?

WHOA! Hold The Horses! Does Obama Have A Secret Agenda Behind Bombing Syria?

Do you remember the snubs that President Obama directed at Israel?  And of course you know about the POTUS having some deep connections with the Muslim Brotherhood, right? Well how does this information square with all of the other information and might it reveal a hidden agenda for Obama's plans to invade Syria?

A senior Iranian lawmaker says Israel will be the “first victim” of any U.S.-led military strike on Syria, predicting that President Bashar Assad’s regime would fight back against the Jewish state.[FOX]

Now wait.  The mess in Benghazi was probably a cover-up for the USA illegally supplying arms to Syrian rebels.  And as it turns out those rebels are probably Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now the chemical weapons attack inside Syria is reported to be a sort of "false flag" event with perhaps the rebels having used the chemicals rather than the Assad people.

We know for example that the rebels are killing children.  And even Vladmir Putin warned the US that the rebels are not the kind of people we want to be doing business with.

So putting all of this together there is the outside chance that what Obama has done is arm Al-Qaeda rebels via the Muslim Brotherhood, inside of Syria and waiting until they had the means to take over or maybe, at the very least, fire upon Israel as soon as the US strikes the match by bombing somewhere inside Syria.

Might it then be argued that Obama would be complicit in any attack on Israel?  And judging by his behavior and his connections to the enemies of Israel, is this really too much of a stretch?

There are a lot of dots.  Connect them however you can I suppose.

A senior Iranian lawmaker says Israel will be the “first victim” of any U.S.-led military strike on Syria, predicting that President Bashar Assad’s regime would fight back against the Jewish state. - See more at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/08/iran-israel-will-be-first-victim-if-forces-strike-syria/#sthash.vJf8POpX.dpuf

Obama And The Muslim Brotherhood Connection

From Gateway Pundit:

Walid Shoebat reported that credible Arabic sources provide video of an Egyptian official connecting the Muslim Brotherhood to Obama’s brother, Malik Obama (Malik being Arabic for “King”).  Recall, Malik Obama is the same brother that the IRS fast-tracked to give a retroactive tax-free status for an illegal charity linked to terrorism and genocide.

 

Walid Shoebat reported that credible Arabic sources provide video of an Egyptian official connecting the Muslim Brotherhood to Obama’s brother, Malik Obama (Malik being Arabic for “King”).  Recall, Malik Obama is the same brother that the IRS fast-tracked to give a retroactive tax-free status for an illegal charity linked to terrorism and genocide. - See more at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/#sthash.SP1CmYK6.dpuf