BluegrassBulletin.com

1200 Fools Gather In Louisville

1200 people gathered in Louisville yesterday to be fooled into believing that a man who sexually violated his 20 year old intern and disgraced the Oval office was worthy of their time.  And what is worse, it appears that they were conned into giving money to Obama's next "reliable vote" by the cad.

Bill Clinton helped Alison Grimes rake together what in the final analysis could be just short of a million dollars, according to one democratic insider.  In addition, Clinton convinced the assembled "marks" that Alison has all the momentum in this race.

As time goes on the entire campaign of both Grimes and Matt Bevin boils down to a hatred of Mitch McConnell.  And for what?

He was hired to do a job, a specific job, and that was to serve as a check on the runaway liberal agenda, see that Kentucky was front and center when it came time for federal budget consideration and to enhance the image of a state which everywhere else in the nation is considered to be home to a bunch of corrupt backwoods politicians, barefoot hillbillies and black faced coal miners living in shacks on stilts in muddy snake infested mountains.

And McConnell has achieved everything we sent him to Washington to do, and more.

He is now the most prominent and powerful republican in our Commonwealth's history.  He has continued to see that Kentucky is a receiving state, that is we get back from Washington more money than we send there in taxes.

He has studied and mastered the rules of political engagement using them to advance the interests of Kentucky and stem the bleeding which would occur at the hands of an unchecked liberal president.

He voted the way Kentucky wanted him to vote until in the most recent days people started saying "No more spending."  In all the years he has been in office voters clearly wanted money for roads, bridges, factories, schools, universities and other government programs that helped the people of Kentucky.  The pop culture trend to despise those who spend federal money is a sea change from the world of just a few years ago.  To hate Mitch now for doing what we asked him to do then is just plain ignorant.

And clearly his class and calm demeanor has helped the image of Kentucky around the world.  The kind of snake handling, back slapping, tobacco spitting hick that most of the people of this country envision when they hear of Kentucky politicians dissolves when the success of Mitch McConnell is mentioned as a real life example in contrast to the fictional images they carry in their heads.

So, for all you who were fooled in Louisville to follow the lead of man who dishonored our country, cheated on his wife in public office, was impeached by Congress, disbarred as an attorney and has been accused of rape like conduct by many women, admit to your debauchery.

And to you republicans out there who still think that Mitch has to go because ......well......he voted for spending, put down the bong and back away.  We sent him there and told him what we wanted.  He delivered what we wanted.  The fact that you now want something else doesn't support your argument that he has to go.

In fact, if you were honest about it, looking for example at his support for the hemp initiative and other measures supported by Rand Paul, it looks like Mitch is more than willing to listen to what you want and to use his superior skills to deliver it to you, something Bevin could never offer.

And to the rest of you conservatives who think that somehow not supporting Mitch shows how truly conservative you are, consider this, once again.

Michelle Obama took the stage at 12:42 p.m. inside a softly lit ballroom at the Sheraton Hotel in Midtown Manhattan for a women-themed fund-raiser benefitting the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

The ballroom had about 25 tables, with several female senators and three Senate candidates in attendance. Candidates included Michelle Nunn in Georgia, Alison Lundergan Grimes in Kentucky and Natalie Tennant in West Virginia.

Obama spoke about the importance of electing a Congress to support her husband, alluded to the government shutdown, and invoked the narrow margin in the Senate to encourage the crowd to "max out."

"And let's not forget about that common-sense gun legislation, that so many of us feel so strongly about. Sadly as you know, that bill failed. Anyone know by how many votes? It failed by just six votes in the Senate. Six. So make no mistake about it: the midterm elections, they matter. They matter."

Obama said there was something the crowd could do to make a "huge difference."

"And it's simple, you can write a big ol' fat check," she said. [Capitol New York]

Read that over and over to everyone who will listen. 

Michelle Obama has singled out Alison Lundergan Grimes as a reliable vote for Barack Obama's agenda, including gun legislation.

It's just what our former adulterer in chief told people in Louisville.  "Follow me.  Write a check so Alison can help Obama."

Don't be fooled by disgusting Bill Clinton who left semen on a young female employees dress.  And don't be fooled by his "Scarlet Letter Tour". 

What he is up to is helping Obama get more votes in Congress and removing the most effective check on that runaway power Kentucky has ever sent to Washington DC.

I ain't fooled, are you?

Alison Grimes Embraces Offensive Absurdity

If you listen to Alison Lundergan Grimes and her echo chamber of far left liberals you will hear them ranting that republicans have waged a war on women. That is absurd, and offensive particularly considering that she is hyping her upcoming date with Bill Clinton. Here's what one editorial in the liberal San Francisco Chroincle says about him:

"[Y]ou have to give [Senator Rand] Paul this much: He rightly pointed out the chasm between how Clinton Democrats treat women as an interest group and how they treat them as people. When Bubba strayed, only the women paid.

The McFadden-Lynch memo serves as a reminder of what the Clinton machine does to women who speak out. They become loose ends who need to be tied up."

That editorial is a reminder that the stain Bill Clinton left on the presidency goes well beyond him getting a 22 year old intern to perform oral sex on him.

There was of course the admission to his affairs with various women during his marriage as well as claims by several of him forcing himself on them:

Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Dolly Kyle Browning, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Wiley.

Juanita Broaddrick told her story to a national television audience last night, saying she did not tell authorities 21 years ago of her contention that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her because "I just don't think anyone would have believed me."

In a gripping account punctuated by sobs, the Arkansas woman told "Dateline NBC" that in her Little Rock hotel room, Clinton suddenly "turned me around and started kissing me, and that was a real shock. I first pushed him away. I just told him 'no.' . . . He tries to kiss me again. He starts biting on my lip. . . . And then he forced me down on the bed. I just was very frightened. I tried to get away from him. I told him 'no.' . . . He wouldn't listen to me."

The nursing home operator, previously known as Jane Doe No. 5, told Myers that she felt "violated" but finally stopped resisting Clinton's sexual advances because "it was a real panicky situation." She said that "he was just a vicious, awful person."

Pressed by Myers as to whether she was raped, Broaddrick said she had been. "It was not consensual," she insisted. [Washington Post]

It defies logic to attempt an understanding of why any candidate, particularly a female candidate, would want to have anything to do with Bill Clinton, unless the lust for the money he delivers at the end of the night is enough for them to put their morals and their values on hold until the affair is over. 

A relationship with a man of such low moral character done solely for money was once the kind of thing that caused people to call you an ugly name.  But today candidates squeal loudly if people call them ugly names and their buddies in the press to rush to their defense whenever Slick Willie is involved. 

You can expect Alison Lundergan Grimes to continue making the offensive and abusurd argument that it is her opponent, rather than her new political bedfellow Bill Clinton who is the one waging war on women.  But I for one think women are too smart to fall for such baloney.

Happy Valentines Day ladies. 

Rand Paul: Bill Clinton Is A Sexual Predator

Rand Paul pulls no punches in the comments below.

Told Jah

Nice to know that others are thinking the same things I am.

I told you recently that the democrats are going with a new "ism" in the ramp up to Hillary's run in 2016.  They are replacing "racism" with "sexism".  We've seen it tried already in Kentucky.

It is rewarding to see others now beginning to discern the same thing.

As NewsBusters reported Sunday, liberal cartoonist Ted Rall was recently banned from the progressive website Daily Kos for publishing a comic strip with Barack Obama in it that was deemed to be racist.

On Monday, Rall spoke with Newsmax TV’s Steve Malzberg about the incident, and warned that if Hillary Clinton gets the Democratic nomination for president in 2016, “sexism will be the new racism”

 

"If you look at the vast majority of people who came down on me, these are white Democrats, white guy Democrats who are just using this as an excuse," Rall added. "Get ready, because in 2016, if Hillary is the nominee, it’s just going to be sexism will be the new racism...It’s what you use when you don’t have anything."

Indeed it is, but Rall's right. Just as anyone that criticized Obama the past six-plus years was accused of racism, in the coming years, anyone that criticizes Hillary if she runs will be depicted as sexist. The so-called "Republican War on Women" will be dusted off again, and every utterance by an opponent or commentator that isn't flattering will be due to Clinton's lack of a Y-chromosome and not because of her views. [Newsbusters]

Related articles

Get Ready For SEXISM!

Look Hard And Find Double Standard In Comment On McConnell/Grimes By Lexington Media

Grimes Is The New "Obama Girl"?

Grimes Linked To Obama Lies

Look Hard And Find Double Standard In Comment On McConnell/Grimes By Lexington Media

Having read the Lexington Paper for many years I was at first surprised to read what appeared to be a relatively fair comment on the efforts of McConnell and Grimes  to "woo" women voters.  The paper began with a hard look at Grimes' and ended with a warning for McConnell.  But on further analysis it turns out that they were really only up to their old tricks.

On the surface their comment might appear to be an attempt to warn Grimes that she could be making a huge mistake by whining about the "Obama Girl" photo I posted a few days ago. 

In early September 2008, just days after Republican presidential nominee John McCain announced then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate, a group of high-profile GOP women called a news conference at the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul.

Carly Fiorina and U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., ripped into the assembled media for their sexist approach toward Palin...

America had its say, and Palin built a strong and loyal following. But on Nov. 4, 2008, exit polls showed that 60 percent of voters said Palin was not qualified to be president if the need arose.

Like Palin, Grimes has a lot of work to do to satisfy voters' questions about where she stands on the issues.

Last week, Grimes and her Democratic supporters expressed outrage after the National Republican Senatorial Committee promoted a picture of Grimes' head on the body of Amber Lee Ettinger, the so-called "Obama girl."

It's up to individual women to decide whether they were offended, but how much stronger would her hand have been had she been a forceful voice this summer when state Rep. John Arnold, D-Sturgis, was accused of sexually harassing three women staffers?

The GOP counter-attack persisted through the election.[Kentucky.com]

Okay, so they didn't give me direct credit for raising that issue in the first place by my series of posts on Grimes, but that's okay, at least they made my points, again.

After this tepid warning to Grimes they went on next to warn Mitch that he better watch his peezencues.

In Hillary Clinton's 2000 New York State Senate run, [Rick] Lazio, a Republican, walked from his podium to Clinton's, demanding that she sign a pledge against using so-called soft money in the campaign.

The Clinton campaign had been preparing the soil for a while, and it was ready to use the incident to turn Lazio's claims of strength into a charge of bullying. When he stepped away from his podium, Lazio might as well have stepped out of the race. The media and the campaign seized on the move as an example of his bullying, aggressive demeanor.

If McConnell takes one step in that direction, he is likely to find a backlash he has not seen before. Folks who decry and debate double standards, as McConnell's campaign did last week, usually have plenty of time to make their points after they've lost in November. [Kentucky.com]

While the warning to Mitch might sound a bit like fair play in reality they have taken a stand in favor of the successful use of fake outrage by Hillary and warned Mitch that in the future they will likely side with Alison and her use of the democratic playbook tactic of "-ism" politics.

Barack Obama was able to shame his critics by accusing them of "racism".  This year, and moving into 2016, women democrats are trying to play the same game only this time with charges of "sexism."

The Lexington publication didn't come right out and say it, but when using the examples of two prominent women, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton, they seem to have endorsed Hillary's success at "ism" politics and denounced Sarah's attempts to call out critics who have lampooned her unmercifully in much more offensive ways than walking across a stage and asking politely for a signature.

Sure, the editorial looks fair on the surface, but in the end, and once again, the LHL is the one applying a double standard.

Hillary's Cornonation Being Planned As We Speak

I had the chance to sit down with some highly placed, "in the know", insiders within the GOP chain of command recently and during one of our casual conversations the topic of 2016 came up.  I concluded that the GOP is pretty sure the next opponent for the White House will be Hillary and that she has a decided advantage.

Now the RNC chairman Reince Priebus has had to duck questions about the involvement of the Fox broadcasting company in putting a mini-series about Hillary on the air.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus is brushing aside a report of Fox’s involvement in a planned Hillary Clinton miniseries on NBC.

Priebus was asked Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” about a New York Times report that Fox Television Stations is in talks to produce and distribute the miniseries being planned to air on NBC.

Priebus has been on a media tour defending his threat to pull GOP primary debates from NBC and CNN if they move forward with planned Clinton specials. NBC responded by reiterating that NBC Entertainment was involved in the project, a separate division than NBC News.

Think about this for a minute.  If the major networks are colluding to air a mini-series about Hillary Clinton, isn't this about as close to manipulative propagandizing as you can get?

She is already measuring for the drapes!

Sex, Drugs And Cover-Ups In Hillary's State Department

Sexual assaults, hiring prostitutes, arranging drug deals and other criminal acts all took place under Hillary's watch at the state department by government employees and contractors.  But that's not the bad part.  It now appears that these incidents were covered up at a high level and only now are being made public.

CBS News has uncovered documents that show the State Department may have covered up allegations of illegal and inappropriate behavior within their ranks.

The Diplomatic Security Service, or the DSS, is the State Department's security force, charged with protecting the secretary of state and U.S. ambassadors overseas and with investigating any cases of misconduct on the part of the 70,000 State Department employees worldwide.

CBS News' John Miller reports that according to an internal State Department Inspector General's memo, several recent investigations were influenced, manipulated, or simply called off. The memo obtained by CBS News cited eight specific examples. Among them: allegations that a State Department security official in Beirut "engaged in sexual assaults" on foreign nationals hired as embassy guards and the charge and that members of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security detail "engaged prostitutes while on official trips in foreign countries" -- a problem the report says was "endemic."

The memo also reveals details about an "underground drug ring" was operating near the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and supplied State Department security contractors with drugs.

Aurelia Fedenisn, a former investigator with the State Department's internal watchdog agency, the Inspector General, told Miller, "We also uncovered several allegations of criminal wrongdoing in cases, some of which never became cases."

In such cases, DSS agents told the Inspector General's investigators that senior State Department officials told them to back off, a charge that Fedenisn says is "very" upsetting.[CBS]

Related articles

Benghazi A Chance To Take Out Clinton

BAM! Crossroads Hits Hillary Right In The Kisser

The lame stream media is doing its level best to tell Americans to "move along, nothing to see here" when it comes to the Benghazi hearings.  Well guess what, this is just the beginning and as empty as some would like to think that this vault of information has thus far proven to be, the digging has just gotten started.

If a second rate burglary was the undoing of Richard Nixon, Benghazi is going to be the undoing of Hillary, Barry and the whole liberal bunch.  Why?  Because there is more than smoke here, there is a raging fire of a coverup.  Karl Rove's group knows this, and they know who the enemy is going to be in 2016, that's why they are pushing this new ad.

 

Related articles

Benghazi: Obama Lied and Americans Died

Benghazi A Chance To Take Out Clinton

Rand Paul: Benghazi Should End Hillary Clinton

Benghazi Could Sink Hillary Clinton 2016

Greg Hicks: I briefed Hillary on Benghazi that night; Clinton continued to blame video

Benghazi A Chance To Take Out Clinton

Today and in the coming weeks much attention will be focused on the blood from Benghazi.  Who knew what?  When did they know it?  What was going on?  Who gave the order to stand down?  Who decided to let those people be murdered?  What is being hidden?  And in the cross hairs will be Hillary Clinton.

The show will be filled with over-reach.  Small whiffs of smoke will be pushed on the media as evidence of a raging fire.  Any  misstatement will be labeled a cover-up.  Crooks and liars will be words used to describe many of the principles.

And while a heavy hit on Obama going into the mid-terms is a desirable goal for many on the right, the real opportunity for the right and the Obama left will be to take out Hillary before she can get her footing for 2016.

But that might be a hard thing to do.  Clinton's are pretty well coated in Teflon and nothing is likely to result in Hillary being indicted or seriously wounded.  So if that is the likely outcome, what is a secondary goal?

Those who don't want Hillary to become president (including the Biden folks and others thinking about a run themselves) might like to create enough sound bites, video clips and documentary evidence now that they can piece together to use against her later.

When the Benghazi circus comes to town today, get ready for some sharp knives and a lot of blood in the water, and look for the sharks to begin circling Hillary.

Behghazi Could Bring Down Obama

Two articles at American Thinker make a pretty strong case for the prospect that the Congressional investigation over Benghazi could explode all over the Obama Administration.  And it couldn't come at a better time for the GOP.  Hillary will be at the center of it all and she is now the front runner for the dems in 2016.

One of the articles points out how the cover up of what took place in Benghazi is a story with Watergate-like implications.  But what happened there to begin with might also uncover a very serious set of actions put into place with the full knowledge of Obama and Clinton which might come close to an Iran-Contra type situation.

It would be good for you to read these articles for yourself because, as they point out, very few in the MSM are covering it.

Links are: HERE and HERE.