Some pretty interesting people are beginning to sense what I told you three years ago when I jumped out front for Rand Paul: he is a man who has landed on his feet in a world that is very ready for his brand of political philosophy. Now he may very well be the frontrunner in the GOP field for the presidency.
Paul has been doing more than almost any other Republican to expand the party's appeal to nontraditional GOP voters—the type of activity that's imperative for future success. He spoke at Howard University and historically black Simmons College in Kentucky (twice) as part of an outreach effort toward African-Americans. His Jack Kemp-like pitch for "economic freedom zones" has even drawn the interest of the NAACP, which invited him to speak. He's been leading the call for reforming drug sentencing, an issue that's won support from many young voters and minorities who disproportionately bear the burden of current zero-tolerance policy. This week, at a Missouri Republican Party banquet, he said the party needs "a more diverse party—with tattoos and without tattoos."
Meanwhile, the politics of the 2016 Republican nomination look increasingly favorable to Paul. He is one of the top fundraisers in the field, has a ready-made base of support from his father's presidential networks, and has proven his savvy political instincts with a made-for-TV drone filibuster and NSA lawsuit. The newly compressed Republican presidential calendar should benefit a Paul candidacy, since he's got the grassroots support to play in the small states and the money to fight forward in the big media-market states that follow.
Paul's mutually beneficial alliance with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who faces reelection this year, is a prime example of his political foresight. McConnell has helped him build chits with the establishment, including donors skeptical of his national viability. McConnell, meanwhile, has gotten tea-party validation to get him through a contested primary against businessman Matt Bevin. He's also benefited from Paul's swipes at former President Clinton, who is emerging as an important surrogate for McConnell's Democratic challenger, Alison Lundergan Grimes. McConnell, if he survives the general election, could become the next majority leader. But Paul, in taming the establishment skepticism toward him, could end up with the bigger prize. [National Journal]
Will Paul be a better candidate if McConnell wins or if he loses?
I don't check Vegas or intrade but my guess is that McConnell is a slight underdog at this point.
And Paul is going to be the difference maker.
The level of his support for McConnell will determine the outcome.
Right now he is staying 2 or 3 degrees removed by hitting Clinton.
That ain't going to cut it and I have no doubt he is assessing his options in real time.
It will be interesting to see what he decides to do and the amount of political capital he is willing to spend to get McConnell re-elected.
Having a Democratic junior Senator may give Paul better options and more votes depending on how it is spun.
God Bless.
Posted by: Mr. Scott Ryan | February 27, 2014 at 04:04 PM