The astounding lead given to Rand Paul by the release of data from Magellan Data and Mapping Strategies pales by comparison to the incredible apology the company issued for releasing results which they admit are "obviously not accurate" since their question did not include Bill Johnson and other candidates.
Now the question becomes, what will the numbers be if the other candidates are included?
Stay tuned. We told you polling was coming soon, and were the first to get you this result, raise questions about its accuracy and show you the details of who was conducting the poll.
Just tell you friends and neighbors about the BluegrassBulletin and remind them: If you don't read Bluegrassbulletin.com every day, you might as well be living in the dark.
The PDF document looks fake. How about confirming it with Magellan. flaherty@magellanstrategies.com
Posted by: KyGuard | February 25, 2010 at 01:08 AM
@Bfair:
Haha ha. I'm just delivering the play by play my friend. Don't mistake my reporting of the news or my quoting others as being my words. When I do that, I usually make sure to tell you it's an EDITORIAL.
Posted by: Marc Carey | February 24, 2010 at 07:03 PM
The Treyson-Johnson-McConnell campaign must be angry and want to strike back.
Posted by: Mel | February 24, 2010 at 07:00 PM
They are redoing the polling?
Posted by: Mel | February 24, 2010 at 06:56 PM
What's with the freaky cat Marcus. Seems like it should be a picture of you eatin' crow?
Posted by: Bfair | February 24, 2010 at 06:56 PM