Should we ask more questions about Swine Flu? I am not prepared to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon, but some questions raised by others seem to deserve answers from trustworthy sources.
Q: Has Novartis
Pharmaceuticals of Basel, Switzerland conspired with corrupt "scientists"
at the U.S. Army Institute of Pathology Ft. Detrick, Maryland, to
create a "novel" strain of weaponized "influenza" virus
by means of "reverse engineering" the deadly 1918 killer strain?
Q: Was this strain released upon the world in March and April of 2009 for the primary purpose of creating a panic-stricken world-wide demand for Novartis vaccine material?
Q: How was it that NOVARTIS was able to apply for a patent on the vaccine in 2005 which was just issued in February 2009 by describing in essence "Swine Flu"?
Q: Why did the federal government modify its policies allowing for forced quarantines of the population and forced vaccinations by adding the disease "influenza" to the list of other diseases, in 2005, the same year NOVARTIS was applying for a patent for a vaccine to prevent a flu that as yet had not surfaced and did not surface until 2009, after the patent was issued?
Q: Is there any evidence that the disease "swine flu" might be spread by some of the vaccines themselves?
A guy with some pretty shaky credibility has raised these and more questions, and answered them, in an article on a far out website. But I predict, that this story is going mainstream within the week.
September 30th, and counting.
Posted by: Redman | September 30, 2009 at 11:00 AM
September 27th, and counting.
Posted by: Redman | September 27, 2009 at 11:52 AM