Suspicions Continue To Grow That Obama's Closure Of Chrysler Dealers Had A Political Component

There is no need for me to repeat the allegations or the factors which have gone into the conclusions being drawn by many that the closure of Chrysler dealerships correlates directly with political support for republicans, and in some instances, closings have been identified which benefit democratic supporters.

But, if there is any truth to this, the Obama administration has really crossed the line.

You can read the story and find the links at Gateway Pundit:  CLICK HERE

Comments

[Redman]

It is not true, not because Gibbs said it, but because of mathematics.

The control group (all auto dealers who made political contributions to either party) shows that of these "auto dealers" 88% gave to the GOP, and only 12% gave to Democrats.

Is it any wonder that the "closed" dealerships would contain many more GOP donors than donors to the Democrats?

Maybe, you should try "the google", before you post these dumb stories.

[Marc]

Blown out of the water as not true? Why because Gibbs said so?

Go read the link I posted and then read all the other links contained in it for a more complete understanding of the debate.

I always post your comments even if you think my stories are dumb. But read the stuff Redman, that's why I put up the links.

[Redman]

Strange to me that you "moderate" comments, but you will post the dumbest stories, even after they have been blown out of the water as not true.

But as a good "Conservative", I'm sure you believe in personal responsibility. Your name is on this blog!

[Marc]

Redman:

You can read can't you?

I posted that the story was out there and provided a link to. I did not assert that it was accurate.

I trust people to read these things and come to their own conclusions.

But first one has to be able to read and think at the same time.

[Redman]

When are you going to retract this stupid story?

There is no basis in fact or reality for this claim.

Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?